Freedom of Information Disclosure Log

The FOI Disclosure Log is a record of all completed requests for information that SEUPB has received and dealt with under the FOI Code of Practice. If you would like to receive a copy of the outcome of any of the FOI requests, please contact us via email: communications@seupb.eu

Displaying 51 - 75 of 85 requests

2014
Heading	Date of Response	Request	Outcome Sort descending
FOI - 2014-04	01/04/2014	"Please find below a request under the Freedom of Information Act. 1) Minutes of Alexandra Park Steering Group meetings where the opening of the Alexandra Park... Full request "Please find below a request under the Freedom of Information Act. 1) Minutes of Alexandra Park Steering Group meetings where the opening of the Alexandra Park 'peace gate' was discussed. 2) Details of the terms of reference, or any protocols, that determined how decisions were made by the Alexandra Park Steering Group. 3) Information of any funding secured by the Alexandra Park Steering Group, or any other group, to support the opening of the Alexandra Park Peace Gate. 4) Details of any consultation work that was completed in relation to the opening of the Alexandra Park Peace Gate."	Information not held
FOI - 2014 - 10	01/10/2014	In your capacity as FOI officer please supply by e-mail: a) A breakdown of costs paid under PEACE III in respect of the Ross Conference in... Full request In your capacity as FOI officer please supply by e-mail: a) A breakdown of costs paid under PEACE III in respect of the Ross Conference in Rostrevor 18-20th October 2013; b) The total monies and breakdown of same paid to the Rostrevor Ross Project since the inception of the PEACE Programmes."	Information not held
FOI -2014 - 08	01/08/2014	"Under Freedom of Information legislation I would like to request: 1). Details of all grant applications, successful and unsuccessful, made over the last ten years using... Full request "Under Freedom of Information legislation I would like to request: 1). Details of all grant applications, successful and unsuccessful, made over the last ten years using 79, Quarry Road, Magherafelt as a supporting address. Also details of bona fides requested by and given to the Special European Union Programmes Body to support each application, both successful and unsuccessful. 2). Details of all grant applications, successful and unsuccessful, made over the last ten years by South Derry Cutural Society/South Derry Cultural and Heritage Society. Also details of bona fides requested by and given to the Special European Programmes Body to support each application, both successful and unsuccessful. 3). Details of all grant applications, successful and unsuccessful, made over the last ten years by Gulladuff Community Resource Centre. Also details of bona fides requested by and given to the Special European Union Programmes Body to support each application, both successful and unsuccessful."	Information not held
FOI-2014-001	11/03/2014	I wish to make a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 of the UK to be provided with the following documentation as soon... Full request I wish to make a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 of the UK to be provided with the following documentation as soon as possible: -Legal advice documentation including e-mails and attachments provided to any employee of SEUPB pertaining to the UK provisions of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE Regulations) regarding the transfer of CRC employees from the Community Relations Council (CRC) to SEUPB. -The verbatim minutes of the SEUPB January 2014 SMT planning meeting held on Monday 20th January 2014.	Information partially disclosed

2016
Heading	Date of Response	Request	Outcome Sort descending
FOI-2016-04	22/02/2016	In accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, I wish to request access to the following records which I believe to be held by SEUPB The... Full request In accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, I wish to request access to the following records which I believe to be held by SEUPB The technical feasibility study for Portrush Harbour which was funded by the INTERREG IVA, Sail West project in which Donegal County Council was the lead partner	Information not held

2021
Heading	Date of Response	Request	Outcome Sort descending
FOI-2021-002 Crusaders Football Club	19/04/2021	In accordance with the ICO - FOI guidance, could I please require a copy of all the following: 1. I require a copy of all Grants paid... Full request In accordance with the ICO - FOI guidance, could I please require a copy of all the following: 1. I require a copy of all Grants paid to Crusaders Football Club from the time period, 1 April 2015 until 31 March 2021. To include, amounts paid, funding title, financial breakdown of Grant/Grants awarded and how the Grants funds were used. 2. Copy of all Economic and Financial Appraisals documents created as a result of any Grants allocated to Crusaders Football Club.	Information not held
FOI-2021-001 Nerve Centre	22/03/2021	1. The forensic accountant’s report referred to in your correspondence dated 28 October 2020; 2. The PSNI’s written confirmation outlining their decision not to proceed;... Full request 1. The forensic accountant’s report referred to in your correspondence dated 28 October 2020; 2. The PSNI’s written confirmation outlining their decision not to proceed; and 3. The additional information provided by the individual who made the complaint following the August 2019 Subject Access Request	Information partially released
FOI-2021-005 Lisfannon Greenway	24/06/2021	To ask SEUPB to provide information on the measures taken by them to ensure that the proposed Greenway funded through INTERREG VA is fully compliant... Full request To ask SEUPB to provide information on the measures taken by them to ensure that the proposed Greenway funded through INTERREG VA is fully compliant with Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protection Area (SPA) EU Directive in relation to the recently proposed revision to the previous route at Lisfannon To provide information on any consultation that has taken place regarding the changes including especially the environmental impact of the new route. In particular, the deviation from the existing proposed route along the roadway to its relocation along the seafront. To provide information on any revised Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR). To supply any comparative analysis on the old and new routes and the differential impact on the environment of both proposals in line with its designation as a Special Area of Conservation.	Information requested not held or not within the remit of SEUPB

2013
Heading	Date of Response	Request	Outcome Sort descending
FOI -2013 - 06	01/08/2013	"Please provide a copy of the Equality Impact Assessment involved in the allocation of Grant Aid of up to £479,615.00 under Priority 1 Theme 2... Full request "Please provide a copy of the Equality Impact Assessment involved in the allocation of Grant Aid of up to £479,615.00 under Priority 1 Theme 2 to Relatives for Justice."	Information not held by SEUPB
FOI - 2013 - 08	01/10/2013	"A copy of the application and business plan for the Conflict Transformation Centre at the Maze which is being funded by the Special European Programmes... Full request "A copy of the application and business plan for the Conflict Transformation Centre at the Maze which is being funded by the Special European Programmes Body."	Information withheld

2020
Heading	Date of Response	Request	Outcome Sort descending
FOI-2019-07	14/01/2020	1. Renumeration and pension costs of Chief Executive, Gina Mc Intyre, duration of her contract with SEUPB (How long has she been there), details of... Full request 1. Renumeration and pension costs of Chief Executive, Gina Mc Intyre, duration of her contract with SEUPB (How long has she been there), details of all travel and expenses costs (including breakdown of expense cost and mode of transport) incurred by her between 2014 – 2020 programme period and details of the locations she visited. 2. Please also provide monetary value and gift details on any gifts register that is in place in the SEUPB and any gifts or other in kind benefits the Chief Exec has recorded in this. 3. Renumeration and pension costs of Directors (Leanne Massey, Mark Feeney, Paul Sheridan) duration of their contract with SEUPB (How long have they been there), details of all travel and expenses costs (including breakdown of expense cost and mode of transport) incurred by them between 2014 – 2020 programme period and details of the locations they visited. 4. Please also provide monetary value and gift details on any gifts register that is in place in the SEUPB and any gifts or other in kind benefits the Directors have recorded in this. 5. CVs of Chief Executive Gina Mc Intyre and CVs of Directors (Mark Feeney, Paul Sheridan, Leanne Massey). 6. Total number of permenant staff employed in SEUPB, details of each member of staff duration in the SEUPB (how long has each permenant member of staff been in the SEUPB). 7. Total number of temporary staff employed by SEUPB during the 2014 to 2020 programme period and the total cost of expenditure incurred in payment of wages and other costs such as NI contributions for these staff. 8. Total cost of expenditure paid and detailed breakdown of the fees and other costs paid to agencies to recruit and maintain temporary and where applicable other such as contract staff. 9. Total duration and contract length of temporary staff who were hired between 2014 – 2020. Explain how long were they employed for (contract duration), grounds for ceasing of contract and/or dismissal. Please include dates of employment for these staff and dates of when their contracts were finished. 10. Total identity of PUL/CNR/BAME staff that were let go or dismissed whilst on temporary contracts. 11. Please also provide information relating to dismissal or cease of contract of temporary staff on a geographic basis (IRL, NI, GB, EU). 12. Total geographic demographic breakdown of all permenant, contract and temporary staff according to location and nationality of staff member. In this context please advise how many staff are employed from IRL, NI, GB, EU or other locations and the identity they associate to. 13. Please provide a breakdown of permenant, temporary and contract staff according to PUL/CNR and BAME (black, ethnic, minority ethnic) background. 14. Total number of cross community projects being funded and the locales they reach into and total value of funding awarded. Please outline the total number of cross community projects being funded internally in NI and in IRL. 15. Total number of cross border projects being funded and the distance these projects are reaching into across the border. Please provide the total value of this funding in NI/IRL. 16. Projects funding that has been allocated to public bodies such as Universities, AFBI, city and county councils in Northern Ireland and Ireland and other public or cross border bodies such as Loughs agency, Irish civil service and Irish and NI water. 17. In respect of point 16 please provide a breakdown of all staff salary costs, travel, expenses and pension contribution in these publically funded and public sector bodies and agencies. Please provide this detail relating to programme period 2014 – 2020. 18. Total value of funding allocated in the 2014 – 2020 period with a breakdown of funding allocated per project and activity expenditure and a total value of funding allocated which was directed towards staff wages and other costs such as NI, pension and expenses and building overheads and running costs. 19. Further to point 18 please provide a breakdown of the total funding awarded according to the allocation of taxpayers monies received from IRL/GB/EU sources. 20. Please provide details of the total amount of audits that have been undertaken in the 2014 – 2020 programme period and who conducted these audits. 21. Further to point 20 please advise how many audits and evaluation reviews have been conducted by Department of Public Expenditure and Reform (IRL) Department of Finance (NI) and the European Commission unit in Brussels or other audit bodies such as National Audit Office London or Audit Office Northern Ireland and details of what they examined e.g project costs, staff costs. 22. Further to point 21 please advise further to this any discrepancies or issues they highlighted in their audits and final reports. If final reports exists for these audits please release this data. 23. Please provide details of the total amount of midway project evaluations submitted and final project evaluations submitted that have been undertaken in the 2014 – 2020 programme period and the outcomes of these evaluations, e.g total number of projects were funding was de-committed as a result of failures to achieve contractual or other obligations in the projects. 24. Please provide the total number of sustainability plans, evidence of value for money on project expenditure costs, return on investment metrics and core business plans that were submitted for projects valued over €2m in the 2014 -2020 programme period. 25. Please provide details of how SEUPB has assessed state aim, procurement and OJEU and de minimis compliance in projects that it has funded valued over €1m in the 2014 – 2020 programme period.	Information partially released

2012
Heading	Date of Response	Request	Outcome Sort descending
FOI-2012-005 Project Audits	01/03/2012	Re: FOI 2012-02 I refer to the above FOI request and your subsequent response. Further investigations have revealed the SEUPB initiated forensic audit of FAIR cost £17,738.06... Full request Re: FOI 2012-02 I refer to the above FOI request and your subsequent response. Further investigations have revealed the SEUPB initiated forensic audit of FAIR cost £17,738.06 to complete. Investigations also show FAIR is the only organisation the SEUPB has subjected to a forensic audit process. Clearly the information sought in my FOI 2012 - 02 request in respect of the cost of the forensic audit of FAIR is in the public domain. In light of this can you please explain why the SEUPB refused to provide me with this information claiming it was exempt from release. I now formally appeal the SEUPB decision to only to provide me with parts of the information requested in my FOI 2012 - 02 request. I would also ask you to confirm FAIR is the only organisation the SEUPB has subjected to a forensic audit. Furthermore, I now submit the following request for information under current FOI legislation. What action has the SEUPB taken in respect of investigating the allegations highlighted in the BBC programme 'Spotlight' concerning serious financial irregularities in relation to funding provided to the victims group, SAVER/NAVER? Has the SEUPB initiated a forensic audit of SAVER/NAVER? If not, why has the SEUPB failed to do so? Has the SEUPB referred the allegations of serious financial irregularities within SAVER/NAVER to the PSNI? Again, if not, why has the SEUPB failed to do so? Does the SEUPB intend to recoup funding it provided to SAVER/NAVER?	Information partially withheld
FOI-2012-002 Audit Report - (FAIR)	01/01/2012	I submit for your attention the following requests - Parts 1 & 2 - for information in respect of the SEUPB actions in relation to... Full request I submit for your attention the following requests - Parts 1 & 2 - for information in respect of the SEUPB actions in relation to the 2010 audit report carried out into the victims group, FAIR and the religious breakdown of SEUPB staff in Northern Ireland. Both requests are made under the terms of the current Freedom of Information Act. Part 1 Did the SEUPB carry out a procurement procedure to recruit the organisation appointed to carry out the audit report into FAIR? If so when, and in which newspapers were the appropriate advertisements placed? How many applications were received in response to any advertisement? How were the applications assessed? Who carried out the assessment process? What was the total overall cost of the procurement process? What was the total amount, including all professional fees etc, paid by the SEUPB to the authors of the FAIR audit report? If the SEUPB did not engage in a procurement process in respect of the appointment of the authors of the FAIR audit report, how were the authors recruited/appointed? Who authorised the appointment of the authors of the FAIR audit report? Was a report compiled in respect of the process which lead to the appointment of the authors of the FAIR audit report? Part 2. What is the total number of staff employed by the SEUPB in Northern Ireland? What is the religious breakdown - in percentages and numerically - of the SEUPB staff in Northern Ireland? What is the religious breakdown - in percentages and numerically - of senior staff employed by the SEUPB in Northern Ireland? I await your response. Chris Anderson	Information partly disclosed
FOI-2012-003 Audit Report - (FAIR)	01/01/2012	Under the Freedom of Information can you please provide me with the following information: 1) If you employed ASM... Full request Under the Freedom of Information can you please provide me with the following information: 1) If you employed ASM to carry out an Audit on FAIR can you confirm the date this company was employed by you for this work? 2) Can you provide procurement and the names of other companies who tendered. 3) Can you provide me a copy of the newspaper advert for the tender. 4) Can you provide me a total of the cost of this Audit. I look forward to your response.	Information partly withheld
FOI-2012-025 Families Acting for Innocent Victims (FAIR)	01/10/2012	"Under the Freedom of Information I request the following information: a copy of the Notice of Suspension of Fraud against FAIR within your Department (SEUPB) notified... Full request "Under the Freedom of Information I request the following information: a copy of the Notice of Suspension of Fraud against FAIR within your Department (SEUPB) notified to the PSNI and OFMDFM and any other body or person notification to FAIR of suspicion of Fraud."	Information partly withheld
FOI-2012-028 Bytel Project	01/12/2012	"We have been instructed by our client to request the following information under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act; Has the audit of the... Full request "We have been instructed by our client to request the following information under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act; Has the audit of the Project by Mr Brian Clerkin of ASM Horowath which was instructed by SEUPB been completed? If so, kindly provide us with copy of Mr Clerkin's audit report."	Information partly withheld
FOI-2012-030 M2M Project	01/12/2012	"I had previously requested information under FOI and the EIR regulations regarding the M2M Mountain Bike proposal at Larne and Raphoe, with the request being... Full request "I had previously requested information under FOI and the EIR regulations regarding the M2M Mountain Bike proposal at Larne and Raphoe, with the request being refused at that time as the process was incomplete. As I understand that all the decisions for projects in the 2012 call have now been made, I would like to re-submit the request for all material relating to the M2M proposals held by SEUPB."	Information partly withheld
FOI-2012-018 SAVER/NAVER	01/08/2012	"The following information is now requested under current Freedom of Information legislation. 1. The date/dates of all SEUPB initiated audits carried out into the actions of... Full request "The following information is now requested under current Freedom of Information legislation. 1. The date/dates of all SEUPB initiated audits carried out into the actions of SAVER/NAVER. 2. The date/dates when the findings of the audits were made available to the SEUPB. 3. Details of the findings of all audits carried out into the activities/actions of SAVER/NAVER. 4. The date the SEUPB referred the matter of SAVER/NAVER to the PSNI for investigation. 5. The date the PSNI investigation into SAVER/NAVER was completed. 6. What action/actions have been taken as a result of the PSNI investigations into SAVER/NAVER. 7. What prosecutions, if any, have been recommended as a result of the PSNI investigations into SAVER/NAVER 8. The total amount of EU funding made available to SAVER/NAVER by SEUPB. 9. What action has the SEUPB take to recover the EU funding provided to SAVER/NAVER by the SEUPB"	Information partly withheld
FOI-2012-024 Families Acting for Innocent Victims (FAIR)	01/09/2012	"I now request the provision of the following information under the terms of current Freedom of Information legislation applicable in Northern Ireland. In 2010, whilst utilising... Full request "I now request the provision of the following information under the terms of current Freedom of Information legislation applicable in Northern Ireland. In 2010, whilst utilising the services of the Central Investigation Service (DARD) in respect of issues concerning FAIR, was the SEUPB and its Chief Executive Officer, Mr Pat Colgan aware the activities of this particular department and its head, Mr Thomas McCauley were or had been the subject of an investigation commissioned by the then DARD Permanent Secretary, Mr Gerry Lavery. If so why did the SEUPB and its Chief Executive officer continue to engage CIS to investigate the FAIR issue . Did the SEUPB receive a copy of the Deloitte Report which detailed the findings of the investigation into CIS and its head of department, Mr Thomas McCauley. What actions, if any, did SEUPB take if it received the Deloitte Report in respect of the investigation into the activities of CIS and its head of department, Mr Thomas McCauley involvement in actions relative to FAIR. A written copy of all advice/recommendations given to the SEUPB by CIS/Mr T McCauley in respect of all actions to be initiated against FAIR by the SEUPB as a direct result of all audits/investigations carried out into the Victims group. In light of the 2010 investigation and subsequent Deloitte Report into the activities of CIS and its head, Mr Thomas McCauley does the SEUPB and its Chief Executive Officer still endorse all advice/recommendations provided to them by this department in respect of all matters and subsequent actions taken against FAIR. A copy of the SEUPB letter dated 12/10/10 which referred the FAIR issues to the PSNI for investigation. Names of and the positions held by Consortium staff who provided advice, guidance and training on procurement matters to FAIR on 17/12/09 and 9/2/10. The venues/locations where advice,guidance and training was delivered by the Consortium to FAIR on 17/12/09 and 9/2/10. The names of FAIR members and staff who received advice, guidance and training on procurement matters from the Consortium on 17/12/09 and 9/2/10. Hard copies of all letters, emails, minutes of meetings and reports involving the representatives/officials of the SEUPB, the OFMDFM, the Department of Finance and Personnel (NI), the department of Agriculture and Rural Development (DARD) or any other NI Executive department in relation to all investigations initiated and carried out by the above named parties into the victims group, FAIR during the period 1/1/10 - 29/8/12 Hard copies of all letters and emails exchanged between the SEUPB and Central Investigation Service (DARD) in respect of all issues relating to, and investigations carried out into the victims group, FAIR during the period 1/1/10 - 29/8/12 Hard copies of all findings and reports provided to the SEUPB by Central Investigation Service (DARD) in respect of all investigations carried out by CIS into the victims group, FAIR during the period 1/1/10 - 29/8/12. Hard copies of all Central Investigation Service/Northern Ireland government departments correspondence detailing actions to be initiated against FAIR as a direct result of investigations carried out into the victims group during the period 1/1/10 - 29/8/12. Hard copies of all correspondence either received or sent by the SEUPB in October/November 2010 stating police had confirmed/stated a 'prima facie' case existed in respect of FAIR. Hard copies of all correspondence, emails, minutes of meetings and reports involving representatives of the SEUPB and the Consortium (Community Relations Council/Pobal) in respect of all matters concerning FAIR during the period 4/10/09 - 29/8/12. Dates and findings of all SEUPB initiated audits during 2010 into the actions/activities of the victims group FAIR . The names of all organisations/government departments who undertook any SEUPB initiated audit in 2010 into the actions/activities of the victims group, FAIR. Copies of all correspondence - including emails and faxes - exchanged between the SEUPB and PSNI from 1/1/10 - 9/812 in respect of all matters and issues in respect of the actions/activities of the victims group, FAIR."	Information partly withheld
FOI-2012-010 M2M Project	01/06/2012	"I have been involved in the Magheramorne regeneration plans since 2001 both through Friends of Larne Lough Community Group (of which I am currently Chair)... Full request "I have been involved in the Magheramorne regeneration plans since 2001 both through Friends of Larne Lough Community Group (of which I am currently Chair) and in relation to film production on the site since 2004. Unfortunately although founder partners in the scheme, for reasons so far unexplained, the regular and constructive communication with Lafarge on the actual plans for the site ceased, effectively since the grant of planning approval in late 2009. As there are fears of a change of agenda on the part of site owners Lafarge, and as requests for details of the Interreg application have been ignored, I need to request a copy of a the application and correspondence under the SEUPB FOI agreement with the two Member States. It is very unfortunate that dialogue has been cut off and I hope it can be restored but the situation remains unsatisfactory and a complete reversal of the preceding attitude of the owners."	Information withheld
FOI-2012-017 Connect G Project	01/08/2012	"ICBAN on behalf of its Member Councils and Stakeholders wish to formally request, under the Freedom of Information Act, the following information in relation to... Full request "ICBAN on behalf of its Member Councils and Stakeholders wish to formally request, under the Freedom of Information Act, the following information in relation to the recent INTERREG IVA Programme Open Call: 1. A copy of the Connect G Application that was submitted for the recent INTERREG IVA Open Themed Call by the Lead Beneficiary, Sabhal Mor Ostaig. 2. In relation to this Project, a copy of the comments / report originally sent by Joint Technical Secretariat (JTS) to the Joint INTERREG IVA Steering Committee meeting on 14th March 2012."	Information withheld
FOI-2012-014 Families Acting for Innocent Victims (FAIR)	01/08/2012	"Under the Freedom of Information I request the following information: 1. In the ASM Audit report it refers to the whistle blower. Shaun Henry has... Full request "Under the Freedom of Information I request the following information: 1. In the ASM Audit report it refers to the whistle blower. Shaun Henry has confirmed that to be myself. I request a copy of the information volunteered by myself. 2. The information passed to ASM and DARD as part of the report which I believe I am entitled to as being the individual quoted. 3. All email correspondence between SEUPB and OFMDFM in relation to projects SACRED, CAPABLE and EINSTEEN from 2009. 4. All emails between SEUPB, Pobal and OFMDFM and DFP concerning FAIR and myself from January 2010. 5. All communications between SEUPB, DFP, DARD and OFMDFM regarding myself since January 2010."	Information withheld
FOI-2012-027 Families Acting for Innocent Relatives (FAIR)	01/11/2012	"Under the Freedom of Information can you please forward the following information. Copy of the letter from PSNI Serious Crime Unit to Pat Colgan referred to... Full request "Under the Freedom of Information can you please forward the following information. Copy of the letter from PSNI Serious Crime Unit to Pat Colgan referred to in the email from John Cherry dated 5 January 2011."	Information withheld

2015
Heading	Date of Response	Request	Outcome Sort descending
FOI - 2015 - 02	01/04/2015	"Using the Freedom of Information Act I request any documentation or information that breaks down the amount of PEACE III and INTERREG IVA funding received... Full request "Using the Freedom of Information Act I request any documentation or information that breaks down the amount of PEACE III and INTERREG IVA funding received by community organisations in Northern Ireland, the border regions of Ireland and in western Scotland. 1) I wish to know the grand total of all Peace III funding spent so far since the inception of the programme in 2007. 2) I want to know what organisations were granted funding through the programme, such as council projects, community activist organisations, community organisations, political organisations, and other bodies. 3) I would like copies of any documentation relating to the budgets of said organisations. 4) I would like to know if any organisations have had to return funds or been sanctioned for using funds inappropriately. I would like information as to which organisations these are. 5) I would like to know if and how many organisations are being reviewed or investigated for using funds inappropriately."	Information partly witheld

2018
Heading	Date of Response	Request	Outcome Sort descending
FOI-2018-04	06/06/2018	Interreg Programme - Old Waterside Station Derry/Londonderry, Translink/DFI Multimodal Transport Hub Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 please supply,... Full request Interreg Programme - Old Waterside Station Derry/Londonderry, Translink/DFI Multimodal Transport Hub Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 please supply, or allow access to, a copy of the case file for the above proposal. Also correspondence/ communications with Translink/DFI leading to the inclusion of quoted support from the Chief Executive of SEUPB, in a Translink Press release issued 2 days before Derry and Strabane District Council planning committee were due to consider the Waterside applications on 11th April 2018 (copy attached).	Information partly withheld